8th Circuit ruling backs tribes’ effort to force lawmakers to redraw N.D. legislative boundaries

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A federal appeals court denied a request on Friday to delay a judge’s decision that North Dakota’s legislative map violates the Voting Rights Act in diluting the voting strength of two Native American tribes.

The denial by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals comes a week before the deadline set by the judge for the state to adopt a new map of legislative districts.

Last month, U.S. District Chief Judge Peter Welte ruled that the map violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in that it “prevents Native American voters from having an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice.” He gave North Dakota Republican Secretary of State Michael Howe and the GOP-controlled Legislature until Dec. 22 “to adopt a plan to remedy the violation.”

The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and the Spirit Lake Tribe brought the lawsuit early last year. They alleged the 2021 redistricting map “simultaneously packs Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians members into one house district, and cracks Spirit Lake Tribe members out of any majority Native house district.”

Other news Funeral and procession honors North Dakota sheriff’s deputy killed in crash involving senator’s son Judge rejects delay of ruling backing North Dakota tribes’ effort to change legislative boundaries US Sen. Kevin Cramer’s son makes court appearance after crash that killed North Dakota deputy

Days after Welte’s Nov. 17 ruling, Howe announced his plans to appeal, citing a recent 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that private individuals and groups such as the NAACP can’t sue under a major section of the landmark civil rights law.

Welte on Tuesday rejected Howe’s motion to stay his judgment. Howe then asked the 8th Circuit for a stay pending appeal and through the 2024 elections. The court on Friday denied his request in a brief order. Howe did not immediately return a phone message for comment.

Plaintiffs’ attorney Tim Purdon welcomed the Friday decision as a “swift denial” and “good news” for the two tribes and the Voting Rights Act. However, Howe’s appeal remains pending before the 8th Circuit.

“Given that the Secretary of State’s motion to stay did not argue that the current North Dakota map is legal under the VRA, we are hopeful that the Legislature will reconsider its position here, adopt the Voting Rights Act compliant map that has been proposed by the Tribes and approved by the Court, and stop the spend of taxpayer dollars on this litigation,” Purdon said by email.

Welte’s Dec. 22 deadline for a new map remains in effect, he said.

Republican House Majority Leader Mike Lefor said the Legislature won’t be able to satisfy the judge’s deadline, given the time that would be needed to craft a map.

“If we did everything today ... no, there’s no way,” Lefor said.

What happens after Dec. 22 with no new map is up to the judge, Lefor and Purdon said.

The Legislature this week restarted its redistricting panel to begin to address Welte’s ruling in the lawsuit. The Redistricting Committee met Wednesday and plans to meet again soon.

The two tribes sought a joint district and unsuccessfully proposed to the Legislature a single legislative district encompassing the two reservations, which are roughly 60 miles (97 kilometers) apart.

North Dakota has 47 legislative districts, each with one senator and two representatives. Republicans control the House of Representatives 82-12 and the Senate 43-4. At least two lawmakers, both House Democrats, are members of tribes.

The Legislature created four subdistricts in the state House, including one each for the Fort Berthold and Turtle Mountain Indian reservations.

Lawmakers who were involved in the 2021 redistricting process have previously cited 2020 census numbers meeting population requirements of the Voting Rights Act for creating those subdistricts.

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.